Silhouette of person wearing sunglasses against vibrant neon pink and blue digital background
CyberArk Best Practices

The 5 Rules You Can Follow When Building a CyberArk Permission Model

Granular permissions are among the most powerful features of a mature PAM platform, but they only work if you design them intentionally. Here are five rules you can follow every time.

Scroll to explore
1

Grant access to groups, not individual users

Access should be granted to AD or PAM local groups, not to individuals directly. When you assign to individuals, every change means digging through reports, or worse, digging through safes one at a time. When you assign permissions to groups, a role or leaver change is a single membership edit.

AD Groups PAM Local Groups Single Membership Edit
Group-Based Access
Add user to group → Access granted everywhere
Individual assignment → Audit chaos
One edit. Every safe. Instant.
Defined Roles

Auditor

Reader

Approver

Approval Reader

Owner

2

Work from a defined set of roles

Build your permission model from a consistent set of roles, such as Auditor, Reader, Approver, Approval Reader, and Owner, plus the system groups applied to each safe. Each role is mapped to a specific set of entitlements, so access is about what you can do, not just which safe you can open.

3
Most Important

Design the model before you onboard

This rule will probably save you the most pain later. If you start onboarding accounts before your permission model is in place, you end up with a pile of one-off permissions that's very hard to audit and support down the road. Define the roles first, then onboard against them.

The Wrong Way
One-off Ad-hoc Inconsistent Hard to audit
The Right Way
Roles first Structured Consistent Audit-ready
Every Safe, Same Structure
Safe: Finance_Prod ✓ Standard
Auditor·Reader·Approver·Owner
Safe: HR_Prod ✓ Standard
Auditor·Reader·Approver·Owner
Safe: DevOps_Prod ✓ Standard
Auditor·Reader·Approver·Owner

Self-documenting · Audit-ready · Support-friendly

4

Apply the same structure to every safe

Every safe gets the same role model, with its own unique set of groups. Do this, and your permissions become self-documenting. Anyone can look at a safe and see who has what level of access and why. Auditors get what they need fast, and the support team isn't left scratching their heads about whether a certain user or group should be on that safe.

5

Roll it out alongside the old permissions

If your environment has been like this from the beginning, don't manually fix it, safe by safe. Generate the new AD or local groups based on the safe names, add the right users, document it in a wiki, and send comms to the affected users. Then apply the new groups while the old permissions are still in place, validate that access works, and only then start removing the old groups.

Safe Rollout Process
1

Generate groups

Create AD/local groups from safe names automatically

2

Add users & document

Populate groups, document in wiki, send comms

3

Apply new alongside old

Run old & new permissions in parallel

4

Validate, then remove old

Confirm access works, clean up legacy groups

Get this right, and your permission structure stops being a mystery and starts explaining itself.

If your permissions have gotten away from you, please reach out. This is one of our favorite problems to solve.